Post by multistrada1 on Feb 17, 2024 17:47:28 GMT -5
I'm always interested in everything RE5. When I graduated from high school in the 70's, I was engrossed in Suzuki motorcycles. My folks said if I got good grades they would let me buy a new motorcycle.
They were a bit concerned when I decided on a GT750, but it was a touring bike and a step up from the GT550 I had at 16. The GT750 lasted me through college and some amazing trips around the country.
I bought my first RE5 in 1984 and still have a nice 76 model I ride quite a bit.
Semi retired now with a long history in the motorsports. I was working with a client recently on a Viper racecar I supported over the years. They had a tool company that made specialty tools for Snap On, and made all the special tools for Suzuki motorcycles back in the day. They mentioned a contact they had at Suzuki was still around and ran the whole dealer support operation back in the day.
The focus of this post is some very interesting history on the RE5. Jim Kirkland, the person who I met with, pretty much ran the dealer support for the RE5 in the US back then. He went to Japan and worked with the engineers on the release of the the RE5. He mentioned that the engineering department was still in the development stage and they made a mad scramble to get it ready for final production. The design and application were good, but the details where still being worked out. The hopes where to refine the design more in hopes to switch over to a twin rotor design later. Suzuki corporate was concerned about what Yamaha was doing with a similar project and times where changing with emission mandates in the US, as well a gas crisis developing in the states.
Jim mentioned the testing they did on the early production bikes. First off, the styling was very different, and the engine looked different from anything ever seen. Not well accepted. Suzuki indicated they wanted to show that they had the best engineers in the world and could master this new rotary technology. The bike performed very well, with a top speed of close to 120 and handling that was better than the BMW's of the day. Much better than the GT750. Oil and fuel consumption where high on the early models, mostly due to the fitment of the rotor side seals. Even with these issues, the bikes were bulletproof and never failed, although some lost compression.
The preproduction bikes had rock hard seats, and he indicated they tried multiple combinations and lots of riding to come up with the final production seat.
Jim mentioned working with astronaut Ed Mitchell on endorsing the RE5. Ed was very critical and insisted on a full teardown and reassembly of a bike, which he took part in. After that he agreed to support the launch of the bike.
Ed claimed that he was a accomplished rider, but ended up falling off a few times during testing at Riverside raceway.
Once the RE5 got to the dealers, there where lots of issues. They did not know how to work on the bike and made adjustments that made things worse. The tuning was critical and oil consumption was high. Jim went around the country
with a crew, adjusting port timing and accelerator pump volume and rebuilding engines. The big issue was getting the rotor side seal clearance just right, once perfect, the compression and oil consumption issues where gone. Knowing the
dealers could not repair these motors, he opened a special factory rebuild shop, just to do them for the dealers. Later on, Suzuki sent updated replacement rotor proper units to the dealers which took care of those issues.
Jim did mention the touring kit was made by Califia and the person in charge of that knew nothing about motorcycles, but knew how to get vendor products at volume for cheap, thus the styling suffered.
The timing of the bike was not good, the restyling in 1976 did not help and Suzuki moved onto the GS750 4 stroke, which was a great success.
Jim indicated that the patents Suzuki had for fixing the issues related to the rotary engine where sold and ended up covering much of the cost of the development.
Just what I heard, stories tend to change over time, but it was cool to hear from someone who was there in the day.
They were a bit concerned when I decided on a GT750, but it was a touring bike and a step up from the GT550 I had at 16. The GT750 lasted me through college and some amazing trips around the country.
I bought my first RE5 in 1984 and still have a nice 76 model I ride quite a bit.
Semi retired now with a long history in the motorsports. I was working with a client recently on a Viper racecar I supported over the years. They had a tool company that made specialty tools for Snap On, and made all the special tools for Suzuki motorcycles back in the day. They mentioned a contact they had at Suzuki was still around and ran the whole dealer support operation back in the day.
The focus of this post is some very interesting history on the RE5. Jim Kirkland, the person who I met with, pretty much ran the dealer support for the RE5 in the US back then. He went to Japan and worked with the engineers on the release of the the RE5. He mentioned that the engineering department was still in the development stage and they made a mad scramble to get it ready for final production. The design and application were good, but the details where still being worked out. The hopes where to refine the design more in hopes to switch over to a twin rotor design later. Suzuki corporate was concerned about what Yamaha was doing with a similar project and times where changing with emission mandates in the US, as well a gas crisis developing in the states.
Jim mentioned the testing they did on the early production bikes. First off, the styling was very different, and the engine looked different from anything ever seen. Not well accepted. Suzuki indicated they wanted to show that they had the best engineers in the world and could master this new rotary technology. The bike performed very well, with a top speed of close to 120 and handling that was better than the BMW's of the day. Much better than the GT750. Oil and fuel consumption where high on the early models, mostly due to the fitment of the rotor side seals. Even with these issues, the bikes were bulletproof and never failed, although some lost compression.
The preproduction bikes had rock hard seats, and he indicated they tried multiple combinations and lots of riding to come up with the final production seat.
Jim mentioned working with astronaut Ed Mitchell on endorsing the RE5. Ed was very critical and insisted on a full teardown and reassembly of a bike, which he took part in. After that he agreed to support the launch of the bike.
Ed claimed that he was a accomplished rider, but ended up falling off a few times during testing at Riverside raceway.
Once the RE5 got to the dealers, there where lots of issues. They did not know how to work on the bike and made adjustments that made things worse. The tuning was critical and oil consumption was high. Jim went around the country
with a crew, adjusting port timing and accelerator pump volume and rebuilding engines. The big issue was getting the rotor side seal clearance just right, once perfect, the compression and oil consumption issues where gone. Knowing the
dealers could not repair these motors, he opened a special factory rebuild shop, just to do them for the dealers. Later on, Suzuki sent updated replacement rotor proper units to the dealers which took care of those issues.
Jim did mention the touring kit was made by Califia and the person in charge of that knew nothing about motorcycles, but knew how to get vendor products at volume for cheap, thus the styling suffered.
The timing of the bike was not good, the restyling in 1976 did not help and Suzuki moved onto the GS750 4 stroke, which was a great success.
Jim indicated that the patents Suzuki had for fixing the issues related to the rotary engine where sold and ended up covering much of the cost of the development.
Just what I heard, stories tend to change over time, but it was cool to hear from someone who was there in the day.